Treatment consensus
A multidisciplinary consensus model considering patient-, aneurysm- and treatment-related factors favouring repair or conservative management.
Based in Switzerland • Advancing clinical neuroscience
Donate ↗Home / Clinical tools / IASCORE
Multiple scores.
One careful view.
IASCORE brings established intracranial aneurysm scoring approaches into one calculation workflow, helping qualified clinicians review different perspectives without treating any score as a standalone decision.
About IASCORE
Structured evidence,
clinical judgement.
The interface calculates UIATS and PHASES from supplied inputs and also presents estimates based on ISUIA and UCAS.
Each framework answers a different question and reflects specific source populations, variables and assumptions. Looking across them can make similarities, tensions and missing information more visible—but outputs must be interpreted in the context of the individual patient, aneurysm characteristics and current evidence.
Open established IASCORE ↗What the workflow brings together
Four established
viewpoints.
Five-year rupture risk
A pooled-cohort score using population, hypertension, age, aneurysm size, earlier subarachnoid haemorrhage and aneurysm site.
Natural-history estimates
Risk estimates associated with aneurysm characteristics and prior subarachnoid haemorrhage in the study population.
Annual rupture estimates
Annual rupture estimates associated with aneurysm size and location in the source cohort.
Responsible use
Scores inform.
People decide.
A numerical output can organise information, but it cannot fully represent anatomy, morphology, comorbidity, life expectancy, treatment expertise, patient preferences or changes in evidence over time.
01Verify every input
02Review model limitations
03Consider factors outside the score
04Use specialist shared decision-making
Open IASCORE.
Continue to the established external calculation interface and review every input and output carefully.